The test “Evil, happy and unhappy animal”: description of the task, decoding

This test was invented by the Soviet psychologist Leonid Wenger based on the Maya Dukarevich test “Non -existing animal”. Both tests make it possible to recognize hidden emotions in the child, and indicate the presence of a beginning development of mental disorder.

Content

It is best to conduct the test “Evil, happy and unhappy animal” after the test is held "Non -existent animal".

The test "Evil, happy and unhappy animal": Description of the assignment

In the process of drawing, the child will think that he comes up with something new, but in fact his subconscious mind will work at this moment. The test “Evil, happy and unhappy animal” is recommended for children over 6 years old, since it is at this age that in a person they can be concealed the first negative emotions.
In order to pass this test, you need to prepare 4 leaflets of paper and colored pencils (one color is allowed to be used). It is very important that the pencil is used when performing the test, since when analyzing it will affect its pressure.

Exercise. On each leaflet, it is separately necessary to draw "non -existent, evil, happy, unhappy animal." For the image of each animal, 3 minutes should go. This will allow the child not to get tired and complete all tasks.

Then the author of the drawings should be called them and tell about life, character, special moments of the existence of each animal.
After all previous conditions are met, you can proceed to the analysis of the drawings.

The test "Evil, happy and unhappy animal": analysis of the drawing, decoding

A general analysis of all images of the test “Evil, happy and unfortunate animal” can be carried out by interpretation of the test "Non -existent animal". Next, you need to compare the drawings with each other.

It is necessary to compare the evil and non -existent animal. If signs of hidden bitterness were found in a non -existent animal, but in evil animal there are no animal, it means the child does not have hidden aggression.

If they are found in two drawings, it means that there is hidden aggression in the child.
It is also necessary to evaluate is the child created by him Evil animal. If clear confident lines prevail in the figure - no. In the case when the image is drawn by weak, jerky lines - yes. The answer - no, means that the child knows how to cope with stressful situations on his own. The opposite answer - yes, means that you need to immediately sign up for a consultation with a children's psychiatrist.

Comparison of a non -existent animal with a happy can tell about inner sensation by a child of well -being.

If, with a story, these animals have many material wealth, then the child feels wealthy and protected.
In the case when the description of everyday life will be mentioned of a large number of animal friends, it means in real life the child is lacking in communication.
In a situation where the phrase about immortality These animals are actually afraid of death and often thinks about it.

Comparison of a non -existent animal with the unfortunate can tell about internal alarms of the author of drawings.

If animals are painted small in size, images consist of many covered lines, corrections, strokes, the total circuit has a large number of empty gaps - the child or has the tendency to fall into depression in negative situations or already has depressive disorders. In this case, only a psychiatrist will be able to establish an accurate diagnosis.
When in the story of an unfortunate animal it will be mentioned loneliness An animal - in real life, the child also lacks attention and care from loved ones.
In a situation where an unfortunate animal is sick, the author of such a drawing feels a weak person.
If the description says that at least one of these animals feels constantly hungry Or it can never eat - a child may feel a lack of material wealth.
In the case when a child cannot say why he considers one animal unhappy, and another happy or evil - this means that he himself cannot understand what a person is. Such a child self -analysis is not inherent.