"The life of the city and the village": arguments and comparison for the "surrounding world"

If you were asked the “surrounding world” to describe life in the city and the village and compare it, then read the article. It has a lot of useful information.

Everyone is known, and even the children that the city is different from the village. In schools, students on the subject "The world" Often they set a description of these different settlements. Of course, finding the right words to complete homework is not easy. The text should be beautiful, correct and interesting. Below you will find descriptions for each of the points "The surrounding world" On this topic. Read further.

How the city differs from the village - a description of life for the "surrounding world": features of differences, comparison

Some people believe that the city is better for human life, others are sure that the village is more suitable. What are the differences? Below you will find a description of life for the "surrounding world" and a comparison of these settlements. So, how does the city differ from the village:

CITY:

• This is a large settlement in which many people live.
• In cities, asphalt roads, multi -storey buildings, many streets, avenues.
• In any big city, many enterprises operate: factories, factories, companies, etc.
• Residents of such a settlement cannot exist without transport. The city area is so great that it is problematic to get to work and from work on foot.
• The city has many various kinds of establishments, entertaining and necessary people: cinemas, hospitals, clinics, shopping centers, cafes.

VILLAGE:

• This is a small settlement.
• In villages, one -story private houses with gardens, soil roads and a small number of various kinds of establishments.
• However, unlike the city, in such a settlement there is very clean air and there is the opportunity to engage in households.
• With transport problems: it can be one bus that takes away the children to school in a neighboring village every morning.
• Public transport in the village is not needed. Indeed, if desired, a person can bypass the entire settlement on foot or drive, for example, on a bicycle.

Other differences between the city and the village:

1. The size of the settlement - The territory of the city is larger.
2. Population density - The larger the settlement, the more residents in it. Hundreds of thousands of people who will never know about the existence of each other can live in a metropolis. And in the village there are dozens of them, and almost everyone is familiar with each other.
3. The availability of transport - There is no transport in the village, and in the city of trolleybuses, buses, trams, minibuses, metro, etc.
4. Different institutions - There are many places in the city where you can have fun, eat, etc. In the village there are practically no entertainment institutions, a public catering cafe, etc. Often in the village there are 1 grocery store and 1 first -aid post for the entire settlement.
5. Ecology - Since there are significantly fewer people and transport in the village, the air there is cleaner and fresh. In the city, he is too glorified.
6. Industry and production are more developed in the city, in the village - agriculture.
7. The mentality of people - A native of the village can be distinguished from a resident of the metropolis by habits, the manner of conversation. This does not mean that one person is better and the other is worse. Just the differences in settlements and the rhythm of life affect the worldview of a person, his speech and behavior.

Now you know what the difference is the villages and cities. Now let's look at what the similarity is. Read further.

The similarities of the city and the village: "The world around us"

There are much fewer similarities between the city and the village. There are more differences, and this is not surprising. No need to even consider these settlements in detail. But there is still a similarity. Here are some of his features for "The surrounding world":

• Both the city and the village are settlements in which people live.
• They live, study, work, fall in love, create families, achieve their goals, experience simple human joys and sorrows.
• Only the number of people and the rhythm of life differs.

But, if the villagers and citizens work in various fields, then such concepts as friendship, love, family, relatives, human relationships are similar.

What is between the city and the village?

Everyone knows that immediately outside the city they do not begin. What exists between these two settlements? What is between the city and the village?

SUBURB:

• This is the name of the territories (possibly populated by people), which are located abroad of the city.
• It can be "sleeping areas" with many residential buildings.
• The suburb is no longer a city, but not yet sat down. In territorially, it is located closer to a large settlement, on its “backyards”.
• The mentality of the residents of the suburbs is more similar to the inhabitants of the city. They can easily work or study in the city, every morning and evening, returning home by bus.
• But their life is more like a rural one. Residents of the suburbs are more oriented towards city life. Over time, they settled in the city.

Rivers, fields, forest, road:

• Rivers can flow between the city and the village, the fields and the forests stretch.
• There is a roadway between them.
• There can be many roads. It all depends on the country and the type of terrain.

There is a railway between the city and the village. If the village is located from the city for tens and hundreds of kilometers, you can come to it by train or passing by the train.

The man -made and natural world of the city and village: comparison of the nature of the city and village, arguments

The objects of the man -made world in the city and the village are different. In the first case, there are more asphalt roads that the forest paths replaced a person, more multi -storey buildings (the more floors, the more people can be placed), cars, and consumer goods - equipment, clothing, and household goods.

But if a car or phone is produced in the city, if jeans are sewn there, then all vegetables and fruits are grown in the village. From there comes meat, milk. Rural residents are mainly engaged in agriculture and livestock. Some of them provide only themselves with nutrition. But there are those who grow livestock, a bird for sale. Thus, it is the man -made world of the villagers that brings both to them and the townspeople.

Meat, milk, eggs and other food that we can buy in the store was created outside the city. Physical addresses of many plants and factories, urban production facilities, for example, dairy, bakery, poultry farms, are located outside the city.

Differences between the man -made world of the city and the village - More:

• Industry is more developed in the city, clothing, household chemicals, medicines, beauty products are produced there, new large enterprises are being built.
• The village is less affected by technological progress, but there is a poultry and livestock, thanks to which a person has food.

We all know that the natural and man -made world is in close interaction. In the pursuit of scientific and technological progress, the urban population harmed its surrounding world. Comparison of the nature of the city and village:

• The activities of factories, factories and other enterprises made air in the city of a gasket.
• For a long time, people forgot that nature resources are not unlimited. They chopped forests, accumulated radioactive waste, drained sewage into the rivers.
• Therefore, there are much more environmental problems in the city than in the village.
• Scientists agree that those who will live in the city in thousands of years may not hear how the stream flows will not see how flowers bloom. All this will be ruined.

In other words, a resident of the metropolis uses natural resources illiterate. While rural inhabitants know what work on Earth is, a respect for it and its “reserves”. There is no lively life in the village, there is little technology there. Therefore, the natural world of the village is more diverse.

Ecology, air of a big city and village: Comparison

The air in the village is clean than in the city. After all, there is much smaller not only people, but also of transport. Also, the ecology of the village has much more chances for further existence, since there are no industrial enterprises in such settlements. Plants and factories pollute the atmosphere.

There are many residents in the big city, therefore, more waste. And not only household ones. The waste is industrial, chemical - all of them are disposed of, but this does not give a tangible result. Garbage rots on landfills or burned, due to which there is an release into the air of various kinds of harmful substances. All this is detrimental to the ecology. In addition, city residents are often sloppy. They can leave food waste right on the streets, ignoring the tanks.

But recently, separate disposal of waste has become very fashionable:

• If each person separately disposed of plastic, metal, glass and other waste, it would be much easier.
• After all, so garbage can be processed very quickly.
• Thanks to this, it will be possible to improve the state of the environment.

Regarding rural residents, they find use to waste, for example, use them as soil fertilizer. Naturally, this is not the main reason that the ecology in the village is better. In such a settlement there are more different representatives of the flora and fauna - different animals and plants. And the poisoned air of the metropolis and the very rhythm of life in it contradict the development of these species.

Bottom line: The village has much more prerequisites for the harmonious growth and development of plants and animals, and hence for improving ecology.

How many streets in the village and city: comparison

Unlike villages that almost do not have streets, the villages have streets. There is enough for the village 1-2 houses, but in the village there are already enterprises of the manufactory: land, land, sawmill, and possibly processing companies. Also in the villages there are clinics, schools, clubs, etc. Of course, all this is not as developed as in the city. But more developed than in the village. Also in the villages there is a cemetery, railway tracks and much more.

How many streets can be in the village and the city? Here is a comparison:

• As in the city, their number can vary depending on the area and population.
• For example, in some villages with the territory 25 square kilometers, There is only 6-8 streets. But such a division of the territory in the village is much less than in large cities.

The smallest villages can count several streets, and the largest cities are the top ten in each of the many areas.

What are being built in your city, village: Tell us for the "surrounding world"

In school lessons, children are often taught by personal example. Teachers are asked to tell about what surrounds the child. For example, what is being built in your city, village. You can tell something like this for "The surrounding world":

• I live in a large city.
• Supermarkets, cinemas, entertainment centers are being built here.
• On the one hand, I like that there are more prospects and opportunities to get a good education, find a decent job, show your abilities.
• But, on the other hand, I am also attracted to the village. After all, nature is more beautiful there, and people are simpler, open and sincere.

In the village, they rarely build something, but still it happens. Sometimes residential buildings, shops and even enterprises are erected.

The population of the city and the village: for the "surrounding world"

If you were asked to tell about the population of the city or village, then below we offer an option of how to do this. This is what is better to write for the "surrounding world":

• Today in the Russian Federation there are 2386 cities and more 134 thousand rural settlements.
• Urban residents of them - 74%, and rural - 26%.

People living in cities and villages may differ in sexually retarded and ethnic, the standard of living and the way of existence.

On the one hand, the village was dying for a long time. This happened because all the youth moved to large cities. On the other hand, now in Russia there is a process of desurbanization. People return to the village for permanent residence.

Small cities and villages: Differences

It is worth knowing that the differences can be found not only between large megacities and villages, but also between small town and rural settlements. These are the differences between small cities and villages:

Small cities:

• It is notable for the fact that they can have one or two economic functions, including: industrial, transport, recreational, agro -industrial and others.
• They can serve large cities.
• Residents of the Small City receive income from industry, trade and services, and not from agriculture and sectors of the primary sector of the economy.

Village:

• Residents of these settlements, on the contrary, survive at the expense of agriculture and other types of activities related to it.
• Most of the food products are not only in their beds, but also goes for sale.

Bottom line: The small city is the same city, only with a small population. As for the village, there is a different infrastructure here, other sources of income, and another rhythm of life.

Why do abandoned villages appear?

Abandoned villages appear because young people want to get a higher education and find a prestigious job, create a family. They go to the cities for a better life.

• In the villages there are only people aged who no longer affect the demographic situation.
• That is why there is a clear outflow of the population from villages, villages, urban -type villages to megacities.
• Moreover, living in the villages, old people, sooner or later die. That is why there are empty houses that no one needs.

In many areas there are whole abandoned villages. Someone is dying, and the house forever remains empty, and someone just gathers his belongings and leaves for the city, leaving a house to which he will never return again.

But recently, there has been a resettlement of some city people in the village. Families who are difficult to feed themselves in a metropolis, due to high prices and lack of jobs, come to the idea that having their own house and growing products yourself is very good.

Bottom line: It is possible that in ten years the rural population can increase significantly. In the meantime, there is an extinction of villages in Russia.

Employment of the population in the city and in the village

The city gives people thousands of ways to increase their income. But he gives rise to great competition. Dozens and hundreds of indigenous residents and visitors are daily in search of work. Here are more about the employment of the population in the city and in the village:

CITY:

• There is always a large competition for one good workplace or place at a university in a metropolis. Lucky only the most capable or simply penetration.
• In a large city, there are many vacancies for representatives of physical and mental labor.
• Arriving in the city, a person can work as a builder and seller, teacher, economist, dentist, accountant. And perhaps it will completely become a show business.

VILLAGE:

• The choice of professions is not great here. In addition to farming, there are few other classes. If there are schools in the village, then a person can get a teacher.
• There is no abundance of vacancies in the village. Employees are always required on the farm, physical strength is more appreciated.
• Many villagers have problems with employment. That is why most of the able -bodied population is so striving to leave for the city.

Modern young people do not want to spend their whole lives in the garden or be tractor drivers and combines. They want a beautiful and bright life.

As for the population, which, on the contrary, goes from the city to the village, its percentage is much less. As a rule, these are peculiar "desperate" citizens. But from the natives of the village, few come back. The city always gives more prospects regarding employment.

Bottom line: Rural "vacancies" is enough one -sided. There is no such variety of professions and opportunities to realize yourself, as in the city.

What is the difference between life in the city from the village: for the "surrounding world"

Life in the city More fussy and dynamic. People are always in a hurry somewhere, crowds in minibuses and metro in the mornings, they drink and eat on a lunch break, constantly fussing on the run.

In the village Everything is quite the opposite. The difference from the city is that the rhythm of life is measured. Every morning, a man gets up to a heapon and knows in advance what will happen to him. There is a set of repeated actions. For example:

• Feed pigs and chickens, take them to graze
• Remove the garden
• Brave the roof of the house
• Plant something, etc.

The rural resident does not need to rush. He can work in the field from morning to evening. No one will pester him with endless calls, advertising, requests. Given that the village has a small population, and fewer various kinds of production facilities and cultural institutions, it seems that life here has completely stopped. But this is not so. The rural residents have their own established daily routine. It is very different from the city, but more systematized.

A rural person has less time for a passive rest, he is several times more engaged in physical work than mental, but at the same time excellent ecology brings him good health.

In the workbook on "The world around him" You can write more like this:

• If a city person earns money, pays for an apartment, buys clothes and various kinds of things in a “finished” form, then a rural man grows products for his food and for food of a townspeople.
• Other consumption items in the village are rarely produced. Therefore, for clothes, tools, other products have to go to the city.
• There are small rural stores in the villages, where there is everything you need, but this is still not a supermarket.

Life in the city differs from the village:

• It proceeds faster surrounded by the benefits of technology and various technologies aimed at facilitating human existence.
• A city man can sit in the office for a day, but thanks to high technologies, he is aware of all the events in the world.
• A rural person does not have time to sit at a computer on the Internet, but he has many times more practical responsibilities.
• Life in the city is more multifaceted. A person can be fully realized. And life in the village is more monotonous. It can bring pleasure, but a rural person is limited in the implementation of their plans. No wonder many inhabitants of the villages go to “storm” the capital.

Bottom line: It all depends on the person and his priorities. If he wants a bright and rapidly flying life with all the benefits of civilization, he will like life in the city. If he is tired of this and wants a quiet, measured existence closer to nature, then the village will be an ideal option.

What is the difference between the work of the people of the city and the village: for the "surrounding world"

In the city and in the village, people work, otherwise they can’t live. If you are on "The world around him" They asked to write how the work of the people of the city and the village is different, then the following can be noted:

CITY:

• In the city, a person can get absolutely any profession.
• He can be an employee of both physical and mental labor. It all depends on his abilities and desire.

VILLAGE:

• The choice of work is limited.
• In large villages, you can work with a nurse or seller, and not just engage in activities related to agriculture.
• In small settlements, a person will still be forced to devote time to work on Earth, regardless of his aspirations.

Bottom line: In the city you can get a job by anyone if education allows, but in the village you still have to work on Earth.

What gives the city to the village and the village of the city - a description for the "surrounding world": shoes, grain, meat

The village gives the city food products:

• Grain crops
• Livestock meat
• Fruit
• Vegetables
• Eggs and others

But in the city it is produced:

• Technique
• clothing
• Shoes
• Furniture and others.

Civilization develops faster here. It turns out that the exchange of first necessities for the good of the modern world occurs - the city gives the village and vice versa.

In the notebook by "The world around him" You can write more like this:

• The city has a more developed infrastructure, so rural residents often come to the city in order to satisfy their needs in the purchases of the goods they need.
• But if not for the rural fertile land, then the townspeople would have nothing to eat. After all, shops would be devoid of food.
• Since the city person has money, he buys everything ready for them. He does not grow any cultures, does not get food for himself as in ancient times. He finds everything on store shelves.

Bottom line: Production and service sector, entertainment industry in the city - everything lives and develops thanks to the physical work of village residents. It turns out that in the field of consumer goods, the city and the village are closely connected.

Why do people leave the village to the city?

People leave the village to the city in order to be closer to civilization and its benefits to get a good education and prestigious work. There is no career growth in the village, the possibilities there are limited. That is why the able -bodied population decides to change their place of residence. This helps people to achieve their goals, to realize dreams into reality.

Why do people return from city to village?

Since all the youth is rapidly leaving the village, the extinction of the rural population is observed. In this regard, the state introduces special programs to provide housing and benefits that give a chance to young specialists, provided that they return from the city to the countryside. This is relevant in relation to doctors, teachers and representatives of other important professions, which are very lacking in the village.

• If in the old days a return from the city to the village was considered a hopeless decision, today for some people there is a certain meaning in this.
• Suppose they can be provided with housing and various benefits.

Bottom line: In the city, apartments and individual houses are expensive, and in the village a dwelling is allocated for free. Therefore, being a rural teacher or doctor is not so bad. That is why now people began to actively return from city to village.

Problems of the city and village: for the "surrounding world"

If by "The world around him" You were asked to display the problematic part of different settlements, you can write the following:

The problems of the city:

• Bad ecology
• Overpopulation
• Many competition for good jobs
• Price increase
• Inflation
• Excess of personnel
• Any kind of economic problem
• Constant haste and vanity
• Permissiveness
• Social problems

Problems of the village:

• Low standard of living
• Lack of prospects for the spiritual development of man
• The extinction of the village as such
• Work deficit (except for physical)
• Less developed infrastructure
• Far from civilization
• Technologies penetrate later than into the city

Bottom line: There are problems, both in the city and in the village. Some of them are solved, while others are not. But people, despite them, choose life - some in the city, others in the village.

Is it better to live in the village or in the city?

Each person pursues different goals in his life. Someone wants to conquer the world, to be in the spotlight. The desire for realization and career growth forces people to leave the village, get an education and find work in large cities. It is worth knowing:

• Not everyone who moved from the village to the city becomes wealthy and famous. After all, the city has a very great competition.
• Nevertheless, the advantages of urban life in developed infrastructure, a progressive society, more chances that can be used to improve your life.

But this does not mean that it is bad to live in a rural settlement:

• The village is a close connection with nature. This means - excellent health for life, own foods, grown with your own hands, natural, less nervous and more measured life without various kinds of stress and psychological shakes.
• However, some rural life may seem difficult and boring. After all, you need to work a lot physically, not having the opportunity to unwind in some kind of crowded and fashionable place.

Is it better to live in the village or in the city? Answer:

• It all depends on the character of a person.
• You can understand both the townspeople leaving for the villages and the villagers who change them to cities.
• If a person seeks to occupy his niche in modern society, significantly improve the standard of living, find a promising vacancy, he should move to the city.
• If he longs for a quiet life in the bosom of nature, then the village will suit him.

Bottom line: It is impossible to say unequivocally what is better. Both in the village and in the city you can live perfectly. It is important that this or that person likes.

What is my city or my village famous: arguments for the "surrounding world"

If you need to write a small story about your settlement on "The world around him", then finding the right words can be difficult. Here is a small essay on the topic "What is my city or my village famous" With arguments:

My city is a large industrial center. Many consumer goods are produced here. Factories and factories are actively functioning. New shopping and entertainment centers are being built. From my city, many famous people come: artists, politicians and athletes.

I am very proud of my city and there are many reasons for this. The football club from my city won the USSR Cup. True, this was a very long time ago, when I was not yet in the world, in the 70-80s. But still, this is an occasion for pride.

One of the most famous factories in my city produces cars for heavy industry. There is also a ventilation plant and many meat factories. Titanic ore and ilmenite concentrate are also produced.

There is the largest enterprise for the production of bridge reinforced concrete structures. Pipeline fittings and welding materials are created and implemented. There are also many confectionery and shoe factories.

Of course, you will not surprise anyone. After all, this is in every large city. Nevertheless, I am very proud of my city. And I believe that everyone should love his hometown, even if he is not yet included in the five largest and most influential cities in the country or the world.

Our city, village in the future: my vision for the "surrounding world"

Despite the fact that I live in a big city in which the number is 990,000 people, I often think about the future of the village. Now many young people are leaving for the city, entering universities and getting a good job. You can say they go for a better share. And subsequently do not return. Here is my vision for "The surrounding world" on this topic "Our village is in the future":

It seems to me that life in the village is as good as in the city. After all, this is clean air and physical work on its own land, which ennobles a person. I would very much like the Russian village in the future would not die out, but on the contrary, it develops.

• Living in a small village is not at all shameful. The village also really needs working hands.
• Moreover, there are not enough young specialists in the village: doctors, teachers.
• People of such settlements also require medicine and education.

I believe that there is nothing wrong with graduating from school and university, go to work in rural areas. Many of my peers do not understand this, but I think this is really great.

• Firstly, in the deaf villages there is practically no competition. A person can be hired immediately, if they need, for example, a teacher.
• Secondly, the state program provides benefits and housing, because the village really needs personnel.
• Thirdly, living in the village, a person uses natural products, breathes clean air, without harmful impurities, and, therefore, he will have a stronger health than a city resident.

In my opinion, even with the development of scientific and technological progress, people should not forget about the village. It's a shame that many villages die out and are literally erased from the face of the earth. People leave them completely ruthlessly.

It seems to me that the villages should not be completely eradicated. This is not only a cradle of culture and history, it is the existence of an entire people. Indeed, in the countries of the former CIS, many people came out of the village families.

It is worth noting:

• I hope that in the future the authorities will be able to establish the infrastructure of Russian villages and will be able to grow craving for the roots in some people.
• The standard of living in the village is lower than in the city.
• But it can also flourish if you develop new ways to resolve the issue.

A rural house is also its own garden, its own piece of land. And in the city, a person has only an apartment. And dozens of people live next to him. There is a special charm in having your own economy. Despite the fact that this is not fashionable.

Bottom line: I think that both the city and the village must exist and be in close interaction. It is necessary that the pluses outweigh over the minuses. Then the inhabitants of the village will not “run away” into the city. For example, in the future I really want to move from city to village. I like private houses much more than high -rise buildings.

Video: city and village | The world around the world is grade 2. Infoor

Read on the topic:

• Project "My Family": arguments for the "surrounding world"
• "Who protects us": the project on the "surrounding world"
• Memo so that there is no fire: questions, answers on the "surrounding world"